Jurassic Fandom: An Ethnographic Study

Internet fandom itself is a widely held presence on numerous Internet communities and message boards from Star Wars, Star Trek, and Stargate to various other science-fiction related series. The fact is, so little know about the Jurassic Park online fandom. The fandom itself was established loosely in 1998 following a year after the release of the second film. The original community itself was a loose conglomeration of Yahoo Groups and Geocities websites. Eventually after the Dreamworks Interactive game, Trespasser, was released fan communities for Jurassic Park organized. The fandom itself was primarily formed from an age group of 15-17 year-olds. After the Yahoo Groups came great sites like InGenNET, Dan’s TLW/JP3 (The Lost World: Jurassic Park and Jurassic Park 3) Page. The site established and entered into a golden era lasting from 1999 to mid-2001 until the “Flame Wars” started.

Flaming is an Internet term for being hostile and making negative comments about another individual. It is a form of Internet bullying. Trolls continually make negative comments on the message boards to flame the other members and cause fights. Troll is another word for bully or someone partaking in hostile actions. The “Flame Wars” were the result of such Internet bullying and inequality amongst newer members. This issue lasted until 2003 when Jurassic Park Legacy was founded by three other individuals and myself. Our mission was the expressed purpose to end the reign of Internet bullying found in the community.

What is the JP Fandom & what does it mean to be a fan?
There are different degrees of fandom: there are the movie buffs, prospective paleontologists, the prehistoric fans, and the die-hard Jurassic Park fans. One can belong to more than one group. The most important thing to possess is a passion for the films and the prehistoric. One long-time fan and close friend that goes by the name of AlphaChaosRaptor discusses the attraction of Jurassic Park for some: “The dinosaurs, of course, both because they were so lifelike and accurate for the time, yet at the same time because they are so different from what we now know them to be like. They took on a life of their own, and people like seeing this idea of a genetically engineered zoological park gone wrong.” The idea of dinosaurs in unseen lands is always a matter of intrigue and fantasy for people.

Some of the scientific community could consider Jurassic Park fans as a counter-culture of sorts. AlphaChaosRaptor points out, “In general, though, there is a lack of understanding of how exactly science works, and what it’s meant to accomplish, which can be easy to lose sight of when the temptation to speculate is so great and easy to fall into on a subject where there is frequently not enough data.” There is some apprehension in regards to “fanboyism” among the group that are scientifically minded and the desire to see the dinosaurs as movie characters.

Fans usually discuss the franchise to an extent of over-analysis often devolving into arguments. This usually “leads into some trying to present their own ideas as absolute fact regardless of whether any real evidence exists for it and entering denial if something doesn’t fit that view. People also tend to engage in arguments regarding which sequel is better, the T. rex – Spinosaurus fight and which is the better animal,” according to AlphChaosRaptor. Conflict arises from discussion of varying subjects to the point most forum threads themselves will be closed by the moderation staff.

My Experience
I found my way to the community itself in January of 2000. I was inducted into the moderator-ship later that month of a site known as InGenNET. I became successful due to my analytical work with the Jurassic Park Encyclopedia from 2000 to recent. I focused on building a huge reputation for myself regarding the encyclopedia as the clear concept of canon was not completely realized totally by the fans.

Others saw purpose in the cause to define canon and felt it would unite the community in a different way akin to Star Wars and Star Trek fan communities. I still maintain the encyclopedia to this day and it was used by TellTale games for their new Jurassic Park game. The encyclopedia is well-recognized by the fan community as a valid and vital resource as a result of my contributions.

Like most Jurassic Park sites, Jurassic Park Legacy has a design that’s reminiscent of something meant to be out of Jurassic Park. Designs themselves of Jurassic Park sites in general incorporate a lot of reds, yellows, oranges, and greens. Some designs attempt to emulate a jungle appearance or an abandoned “industrialized” jungle appearance that was seen in the second film, The Lost World: Jurassic Park.

Meaning can be found in belonging to something. Jurassic Park is still an infantile fandom that doesn’t have nearly the decades behind it that Star Wars and Star Trek have. Due to this the fandom is constantly growing and constantly changing; however, the aspirations of the fandom itself remain extraordinarily high and often fraught with failure. For example, fan films and game mod conversions dominate that list extensively.

Building Prestige
Notoriously, Jurassic Park fans collect dinosaurs or Jurassic Park merchandise from when the film was released. I have in my hands a Thrasher T-Rex from The Lost World: Jurassic Park toy line. A lot of fans favor the T.rex for its power and grace. I chose the Thrasher because it is my favorite, but there are other sought after items of “Jurassic Gold”. Tyrannosaurs in the community are heavily regarded in addition to other popular theropod dinosaurs such as Velociraptor and Dilophosaurus. Spinosaurus is also popular in its own right as well even though people disliked how it was portrayed in the third film.

The Thrasher is at least twenty inches long and is a mixture of greenish gray, black stripes, and white underbelly. The Thrasher is actually meant to be the female Tyrannosaurus from the second film and is adorned with a “Mark of Jurassic Park”. The Mark of Jurassic Park adorns almost all JP products and boldly states “If it’s not Jurassic Park, then it’s extinct!” In addition, the T.rex toy is made of a rubbery skin with moveable arms, legs, clamping jaws, and thrashing head and tail action. It also came included, originally, with capture gear, which basically was a set of restraints that could be strapped to the animal to signify it was captured by humans.

A majority of fans collect the toys due to their heavy symbolic nature. The toys themselves capture the feeling and spirit of the films in the eyes of most. Many also believe that the larger the collection, the more serious the fan. Some fans even get ridiculed for selling what appears their entire collection. A favored pastime in the community is taking pictures of the toys in various dioramas and action poses. Eventually the photography itself is published and featured on various websites, primarily on JPToys and JPLegacy’s forums. If the member’s dioramas do well enough they will end up receiving and building their own prestige and become known for their work. Many people in the community that collect Jurassic Park figures also collect other dinosaur memorabilia.

Another method of acquiring a recognized status in the community is joining up as staff on a website or just generally by being knowledgeable about the source material ranging from the films, novels, comics, games, toys, and the rides.  Knowledge is a highly sought after commodity in the fandom. If the member displays knowledge of the franchise on an expert level the member will often be recognized and rewarded for it. Fan projects are another way to contribute. Unfortunately, some fan oriented projects are destined to failure such as game modifications as well as most fan films. “Jack DeLaMare” was one of the most successful in developing a serious fan film that wasn’t a hokey satire of the Jurassic Park franchise. The Prime Survival fan film, though was fraught with overwhelming challenges due to lack of experience with film making in addition to apathy of some of the other individuals tied to the production. The problem at this point in time in the fandom is that a lot of desire to be collaborative on realistic projects such as the encyclopedia is in sharp decline.

Membership Relations/Organizational Functionality
The fandom itself is a turbulent and volatile culture due to the constant shifts in power. Due to the turbulent history, websites like JPLegacy have adopted a sort of governmental body similar to functionality of a benevolent dictatorship. This is to safe-guard the community from bullies and those who would manipulate these politics to their advantage. Other sites are fewer with their hands-on in terms of administration when compared to JPLegacy. The community itself has had to repeal the stereotype of children being into dinosaurs mostly as it matures as well as individuals who choose to speculate without evidence and parade it as fact when it comes to matters of the encyclopedia.

The initial conflict began back at inGenNET, which was fraught with numerous civil wars within the staff and user base. My group on inGenNET felt that the equal treatment among new members would promote a positive and cohesive environment that would allow new members to build prestige to belong based on fan works and ideas. The others believed into a “bully to gain respect” motto, which resulted in the death of many great websites such as InGenNET, JPAftermath, Jurassic Park Database, Jurassic Island, Jurassic Kingdom, Jurassic Park Gateway, and the list goes on of casualties.  AlphaChaosRaptor’s view on the “Flame Wars” is very similar to my take on the events: “These conflicts were mostly driven by needless personality conflicts and people having nothing better to do than argue with others in order to uplift themselves. In the end it created an almost dog-eat-dog environment where only the people that could run the gauntlet of insulting commentary and put up with whatever was thrown at them would be able to stay.”  The “Flame Wars” raged for years from 2001 to 2006 roughly before the aggressors disappeared. Further, the wounds of the war still affect us to this day. “The resulting posting environment transferred from site to site, and eventually consumed itself after forcing many of the good people from our generation in the community to leave. The behavior of the people that were left was passed on to other members, and not all of it was good.”

My group had several names for the bullies in the community. Some of these names were: pseudo-intellectual swine (PIS) or more common “The Idiots”. The reason we referred to them as such was due to their methods of attack with belittling and alienating others for not having an opinion other than what they deemed as status quo, which in itself was constantly changing. In a contemporary issue, a similar pattern is unfortunately taking shape with some members using speculation as fact in the encyclopedia process, and even condemning others for not agreeing with them.

“The Idiots” also used their intelligence to attempt to make the moderation and administrators look bad by claiming injustice when they were punished. If a site owner would stand up against them then “The Idiots” would recruit others, often friends, to try to bludgeon the administration into unbanning them either by flooding a message board, trolling, or countering their ban by having alternate accounts. Often they would dictate the terms of stopping their activity, which often resulted in them being granted a position of power as staff to continue to otherwise promote their social inequality manifesto. Flooding is essentially the practice of pressing the “submit” button on posts multiple times for posting a new thread. The overall reign of “The Idiots” has resulted in years of turmoil from the communities where numerous fans have otherwise left the community. People of my generation are very limited in number.

Conclusion
While the fandom suffers from social inequality there are positive individuals striving to constantly repeal that inequality with knowledge of the franchise and fan projects. The fandom itself has rebounded in some aspects after the “flame wars”, but still is constantly plagued by the same personality type that engages in the hazing of individuals promoting social inequality. Additionally, due to the chaotic membership base the fandom itself may be in decline due to the lack of official supplemental material from Universal. This research suggests that, due to the turbulent nature of the fandom, the community is a volatile state, and in need of social order that needs to continue to establish itself through cohesive venues such as franchise awareness and fan-oriented projects. Knowledge is a commodity clearly in this fandom and does help to improve member relations. Those with the knowledge of the franchise clearly gain prestige and acknowledgment through their efforts and positive contributions for the community.

Project: Dryptosaurus Contest! Extension

Still want one of these shirts? You can still get one!

For the first time ever, Project: Dryptosaurus is doing a community-wide outreach contest to include the world. We want to hear from you! Can you write a story involving Dryptosaurus?  Can you draw a Dryptosaurus? Can you sculpt a Dryptosaurus? Can you make even a short film about Dryptosaurus? For the talented people out there if you can do this then this contest is for you! Show us your creativity with what you can do to promote Dryptosaurus to the world. The original contest ended on May 23rd 2011 – but we extended it until July 18th, 2011. With all contests there’s a catch and you’re helping a good cause with this. You must “LIKE” the Facebook fan page in order to be eligible to place your entry into the contest! You can like Project Dryptosaurus by clicking here! Submissions should be sent to tyrannosaur@jplegacy.org.

“What Everyone Should Know About Paleontology” by Thomas R. Holtz Jr.

While browsing the Dinosaur Mailing List and the various paleoblogs out there recently I stumbled upon this gem of an article by Dr. Thomas Holtz Jr. in regards to what everyone should know about paleontology. I’ve been an aspiring paleontologist for years and it’s nice to see something that could be used a point-by-point done by one of the professionals out there. Personally, he’s one of my favorite paleontologists out there around and actually worked on the Jurassic Park Institute Dinosaur Field Guide a while back. The question was posed by Roberto Takata from the Dinosaur Mailing List. Project Dryptosaurus even posted a copy of this on their site.

“What Should Everyone Know About Paleontology?” 
by Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.

I think that is a good question. What really are the most important elements of paleontology that the general public should understand? I took a shot at coming up with a list of key concepts, based on experiences with teaching paleontology and historical geology and with less-formally structured outreach to the public. I have offered this list (cross posted at the Sauropod Vertebrae Picture of the Week, Dave Hone’s Archosaur Musings, and Superoceras blogs) as a way for it to reach a wider audience. That this is Darwin Week makes it even more appropriate, as we should use this occasion to encourage a better understanding of the changes of Earth and Life through Time for the public at large.
Much as I might like to think otherwise, the specific details of the hindlimb function of Tyrannosaurus rex or the pneumatic features of brachiosaurid vertebrae really are not the most important elements of the field. Understanding and appreciating the nitty gritty details of the phylogeny and anatomy of any particular branch of the Tree of Life are not really necessary for everyone to know, any more than we would regard detailed knowledge of bacterial biochemistry or the partitioning of minerals in a magma chamber to be significant general knowledge. (Indeed, these latter two items are actually far more critical for human society than any specific aspect of paleontology, and so from a certain point of view really more important for people to know than the History of Life.)
That said, all human societies and many individuals have wondered about where we have come from and how the world came to be the way it is. This is, in my opinion, the greatest contribution of paleontology: it gives us the Story of Earth and Life, and especially our own story.
I have divided this list into two sections. The first is a list of general topics of paleontology, touching on the main elements of geology that someone would need to know for fossils to make any sense. The second is the more specific list of key points in the history of life.
(NOTE: as the idea of this list is that it should be aimed at the general public, I have tried to avoid technical terminology where possible.)

GENERAL:

  • That rocks are produced by various factors (erosion à sedimentation; metamorphism; volcanic activity; etc.)
  • That rocks did not form at a single moment in time, but instead have been and continue to be generated throughout the history of the planet.
  • That fossils are remains of organisms or traces of their behavior recorded in those rocks.
  • That rocks (and the organisms that made the fossils) can be thousands, millions, or even billions of years old.
  • That the species discovered as fossils, and the communities of organisms at each place and time, are different from the same in the modern world and from each other.
  • That despite these differences that there is continuity between life in the past and life in the present: this continuity is a record of the evolution of life.
  • That we can use fossils, in conjunction with anatomical, molecular, and developmental data of living forms, to reconstruct the evolutionary pattern of life through time.
  • That fossils are incomplete remains of once-living things, and that in order to reconstruct how the organisms that produced them actually lived, we can:
    • Document their anatomy (both gross external and with the use of CT scanning internal), and compare them to the anatomy of living creatures in order to estimate their function;
    • Examine their chemical composition, which can reveal aspects of their biochemistry;
    • Examine their microstructure to estimate patterns of growth;
    • Model their biomechanical functions using computers and other engineering techniques;
    • Investigate their footprints, burrows, and other traces to reveal the motion and other actions of the species while they were alive;
    • And collect information of the various species that lived together in order to reconstruct past communities.
  • However, with all that, fossils are necessarily incomplete, and there will always be information about past life which we might very much want to know, but which has been forever lost. Accepting this is very important when working with paleontology.
  • That environments of the past were different from the present.
  • That there have been episodes of time when major fractions of the living world were extinguished in a very short period of time: such data could not be known without the fossil record.
  • That entire branches of the tree of life have perished (sometimes in these mass extinction events, sometimes more gradually).
  • That certain modes of life (reef formers, fast-swimming marine predators, large-bodied terrestrial browsers, etc.) have been occupied by very different groups of organisms at different periods of Earth History.
  • That every living species, and every living individual, has a common ancestor with all other species and individuals at some point in the History of Life.

SPECIFIC:
Honestly, despite the fact the specific issues about specific parts of the Tree of Life are the ones that paleontologists, the news media, the average citizen, etc., are more concerned with, they really are much less significant for the general public to know than the points above. Sadly, documentary companies and the like keep on forgetting that, and keep on forgetting that a lot of the public does not know the above points.
Really, in the big picture, the distinction between dinosaurs, pterosaurs, and crurotarsans are trivialities compared to a basic understanding that the fossil record is our document of Life’s history and Earth’s changes.
Summarizing the key points of the history of life over nearly 4 billion years of evolutionary history is a big task. After all, there is a tendency to focus on the spectacular and sensationalized rather than the ordinary and humdrum. As Stephen Jay Gould and others often remarked, from a purely objective external standpoint we have always lived in the Age of Bacteria, and the changing panoply of animals and plants during the last half-billion years have only been superficial changes.
But the question wasn’t “what should a dispassionate outsider regard as the modal aspect of the History of Life?”; it was “What should everyone know about paleontology?” Since we are terrestrial mammals of the latest Cenozoic, we have a natural interest in events on the land and during the most recent parts of Earth History. That is a fair bias: it does focus on who WE are and where WE come from.

That said, here is a list of key concepts in the history of life. Other researchers might pick other moments, and not include some that I have here. Still, I believe most such lists would have many of the same key points within them.

  • Life first developed in the seas, and for nearly all of its history was confined there.
  • For most of Life’s history, organisms were single-celled only. (And today, most of the diversity remains single-celled).
  • The evolution of photosynthesis was a critical event in the history of Earth and Life; living things were able to affect the planet and its chemistry on a global scale.
  • Multicellular life evolved independently several times.
  • Early animals were all marine forms.
  • The major groups of animals diverged from each other before they had the ability to make complex hard parts.
  • About 540 million years ago, the ability to make hard parts became possible across a wide swath of the animal tree of life, and a much better fossil record happened.
  • Plants colonized land in a series of stages and adaptations. This transformed the surface of the land, and allowed for animals of various groups to follow afterwards.
  • For the first 100 million years or so of skeletonized animals, our own group (the vertebrates) were relatively rare and primarily suspension feeders. The evolution of jaws allowed our group to greatly diversify, and from that point onward vertebrates of some form or other have remained apex predators in most marine environments.
  • Complex forests of plants (mostly related to small swampland plants of today’s world) covered wide regions of the lowlands of the Carboniferous.
  • Burial of this vegetation before it could decay led to the formation of much of the coal that powered the Industrial Revolution and continues to power the modern world.
  • While most of the coal swamp plants required a moist ground surface on which to propagate, one branch evolved a method of reproduction using a seed. This adaptation allowed them to colonize the interiors, and seed plants have long since become the dominant form of land plant.
  • In the coal swamps, one group of arthropods (the insects) evolved the ability to fly. From this point onward insects were to be among the most common and diverse land animals.
  • Early terrestrial vertebrates were often competent at moving around on land as adults, but typically had to go back to the water in order to reproduce. In the coal swamps one branch of these animals evolved a specialized egg that allowed them to reproduce on land, and thus avoid this “tadpole” stage.
  • These new terrestrial vertebrates—the amniotes—diversified into many forms. Some included the ancestors of modern mammals; others the ancestors of today’s reptiles (including birds).
  • A tremendous extinction event, the largest in the age of animals, devastated the world about 252 million years ago. Caused by the effects and side-effects of tremendous volcanoes, it radically altered the composition of both marine and terrestrial communities.
  • In the time after this Permo-Triassic extinction, reptiles (and especially a branch that includes the ancestors of crocodilians and dinosaurs) diversified and became ecologically dominant in most medium- to large-sized niches.
  • During the Triassic many of the distinctive lineages of the modern terrestrial world (including turtles, mammals, crocodile-like forms, lizard-like forms, etc.) appeared. Other groups that would be very important in the Mesozoic but would later disappear (such as pterosaurs and (in the seas) ichthyosaurs and plesiosaurs) evolved at this time.
  • Dinosaurs were initially a minor component of these Triassic communities. Only the tall, long-necked sauropodomorphs were ecologically diverse during this time among the various dinosaur branches. However, a mass extinction event at the end of the Triassic (essentially the Permo-Triassic extinction in miniature) allowed for the dinosaurs to diversify as their competitors had vanished.
  • During the Jurassic, dinosaurs diversified. Some grew to tremendous size; some evolved spectacular armor; some become the largest carnivorous land animals the world had seen by this point. Among smaller carnivorous dinosaurs, an insulating covering of feathers had evolved to cover the body (possibly from a more ancient form shared by all dinosaurs). Among the feathered dinosaurs were the ancestors of the birds.
  • Other terrestrial groups such as pterosaurs, crocodile-ancestors, mammals, and insects continued to diversify into new habits.
  • During the Jurassic and (especially) the Cretaceous, a major transformation of marine life occurred. Green-algae phytoplankton were displaced by red-algae phytoplankton (which continue to dominate modern marine ecosystems). A wide variety of new predators—advanced sharks and rays, teleost fish, predatory snails, crustaceans with powerful claws, specialized echinoids, etc.—appeared, and the sessile surface-dwelling suspension feeders that dominated the shallow marine communities since the Ordovician became far rarer. Instead, more mobile, swimming, or burrowing forms became more common.
  • During the Cretaceous one group of land-plants evolved flowers and fruit and thus tied their reproduction very closely with animals. Although not immediately ecologically dominant, this type of plants would eventually come to be the major land plant group.
  • The impact of a giant asteroid—coupled with other major on-going environmental changes—brought an end to the Mesozoic. Most large-bodied groups on land and sea, and many smaller bodied forms, disappeared. The only surviving dinosaurs were toothless birds.
  • The beginning of the Cenozoic saw the establishment of mammals as the dominant group of large-bodied terrestrial vertebrates. Early on mammals colonized both the sea and the air as well.
  • During its beginning the Cenozoic world was warm and wet, much like the Cretaceous. However, a number of changes of the position of the continents and the rise of mountain ranges caused the climates to cool and dry.
  • As the world cooled and dried, great grasslands developed (first in South America, and later nearly all other continents).
  • Various groups of animals adapted to the new grassland conditions. Herbivorous mammals became swift runners with deep-crowned teeth, often living in herds for protection. Mammalian predators became swifter as well, some becoming pack hunters.
  • Other new plant communities evolved, and new animal communities which inhabited them. The rise of modern meadows (dominated by daisy-related plants and grasses) saw the diversification of mouse-and-rat type rodents, many frogs and toads, advanced snakes, songbirds, etc.
  • A group of arboreal mammals with very big brains, complex social communities, and gripping hands—the primates—produced many forms. In Africa one branch of these evolved to live at mixed forest-grassland margins, and from this branch evolved some who became fully upright and moved out into the grasslands.
  • This group of primates retained and advanced the ability to use stone tools that its forest-dwelling ancestors already had. Many branches evolved, and some developed even larger brains and more complex tools. It is from among these that the ancestors of modern humans and other close relatives evolved, and eventually spread out from Africa to other regions of the planet.
  • About 2.6 million years ago a number of factors led to ice age conditions, where glaciers advanced and retreated. Various groups of animals evolved adaptations for these new cold climates.
  • The early humans managed to colonize much of the planet; shortly after their arrival into new worlds, nearly all the large-bodied native species disappeared.
  • At some point before the common ancestor of all modern humans spread across the planet, the ability to have very complex symbolic language evolved. This led to many, many technological and cultural diversifications which changed much faster than the biology of the humans themselves.
  • In western Asia and northern Africa (and eventually in other regions), modern humans developed techniques to grow food under controlled circumstances, leading to true agriculture. (Other cultures are known to have independently evolved proto-agricultural techniques).
  • This Neolithic revolution allowed for the development of more settled communities, specialization of individual skills within a community (including soldiers, metallurgists, potters, priests, rulers, and with the rise of writing, scribes).
  • From this point we begin to get a written record, and so the historians can take up the story…

This list is obviously not comprehensive, and there are many elements that I had to ignore to keep it relatively short. Still, I hope this overview helps put where we as a species fit into the larger perspective of Life’s long voyage, a voyage that could only have been traced by the study of fossils.

By far truly awesome and a big thank you to Dr. Holtz for making this awesome post to help people out there.

Where we find news…

The previous post addressed (very briefly) how Coranto was used to post news. This post is basically where we go for news.

We have two types of websites we visit daily for news. Firstly; film websites. We are a Jurassic Park website, after all. We have to be on the ball for breaking news. My personal recommendations for the latest news in Hollywood, JP or otherwise includes www.ropeofsilicon.com and www.aintitcool.com. Of course, we use a lot more than two websites for this. We search at least fourteen websites about news information. DVD/BluRay releases, and so on.

The second type of website we use are scientific websites. These range from National Geographic, to Nature, to even regular news such as the BBC. We try to cover paleontological finds (Generally dinosaurs, of course) to provide our more scientific curious fans with a steady stream of information. As the world of dinosaurs is rapidly changing, we have to keep on top of this. It allows us to keep our users in touch with the reality aspect!

Lastly… arguably our most useful source if news is from within the community. We’ve had a few stories recently uncovered by fans not working on the staff who have provided us with the scoop to put on the front page. The help from the community is undoubtedly a great asset for our website, however we’re not out of a job…

yet. If you have something newsworthy to post; please post it so it can make the site page!

How we post news: Coranto

Coranto is the tool used to post up news by the Jurassic Park Legacy staff. (http://www.coranto.org/) We use it in combination with the HTML language, which allows fancy graphics, bold, italicized, and underlined fonts for the eye-catching effect. These allow us to deliver news and emphasize certain points.
Formatting is done through various HTML codes which are entered into a “post”. These HTML codes are added similarly to how parenthesi and quotation marks are applied. However, we call these “tags”. Tags can do various things such as shrinking images down (“thumbnails”), marqueeing (moving) text, or centering text. For Jurassic Park Legacy, and other websites, however, a key element in the web journalist’s weapon is in the use of bold, italics, underlining, and colors. “Fancy fonts”.

Why the fancy fonts? Why the interesting colors? Well, basically its a bit of psychology. See what I did there? The use of bold and italicization is to draw the attention of the reader to specific words through emphasis. The eye naturally is drawn to these different words because they stand out from the crowd of dull 12 Times New Roman. This is a trick of advertising and journalism, particularly web journalism and advertising where you might not be able to use colorful font, or pictures. Naturally the strength of this effect can be lost when overused! Nobody wants to read something completely in bold. It hurts the eyes and it abuses the effect. Likewise, bolding every other line looks awful. Roadsigns DONT APPEAR IN ALL CAPS BOLD unless they’re warnings, and even then, notice that they don’t retain that format for the entire sign?

Its to keep the eye fixed on the important terms. That is why we recommend, and try to use these unique formats to their proper use and nothing more. We don’t want a blind audience, but we do want to hammer home our points. AND THIS IS REALLY ANNOYING!